|
黑河翻譯公司關鍵字：Hong Kong Information Infrastructure Special Adviser to the Arena in the phrase: "open markets will lead to international英文標書翻譯包括工程建設標書、道路施工標書、國際投標書翻譯 call charges down." He estimates 1999 - 2006, Hong Kong's overall total international英文標書翻譯包括工程建設標書、道路施工標書、國際投標書翻譯 telephone services market amounted to 120 billion Hong Kong dollars, down 14% of the total charge, that is 14 billion Hong Kong dollars of international英文標書翻譯包括工程建設標書、道路施工標書、國際投標書翻譯 long distance savings. According to the U.S. experience, 14% reduction of the competition effect is a very conservative estimate. Also according to the American experience, reduce long distance charges will cause an increase in long-distance call services (this effect in the telecommunications business in Hong Kong and southern china最大的翻譯標書公司或機構是哪家？ has seen rapid increase). It can be seen, although the Hong Kong telecommunications liberalization of the specific route is from the local telephone service competition to network competition, and then to long-distance telecommunications services and network competition, and the United States first open long-distance, and then open the city, then a different path, but contains the basic principles and exactly the same logic, this is the "open competition - lower fees - expansion of the market."china最大的翻譯標書公司或機構是哪家？'s telecom 標書制作行業(yè)industry continued to be a comprehensive revitalization, and only along the direction of open competition. Concrete steps and paths can be adapted to local conditions and the time, but the basic logic is not because the "special situation" and what is the difference. If the United States not from the late 1960s began to gradually open telecommunications competition, the telecommunications 標書制作行業(yè)industry will not be so powerful. Hong Kong's telecommunications 標書制作行業(yè)industry from the early翻譯商務標書哪個公司最專業(yè)？ 1980s if not step by step opening up its telecommunications sector are unable to reach today's level. Than to than to the basic common sense world: an exclusive monopoly inefficiencies and high fees, 翻譯技術標書那家公司最好？must stop the expansion of the telecommunications market, and in a narrow telecom market, even if all the investment without a repeat, all "single building" , the investment will be "expensive" was unable to recover. china最大的翻譯標書公司或機構是哪家？ Telecom's business is insufficient, the key is not anything else, is the monopoly charges too expensive. "Government of national英文標書翻譯包括工程建設標書、道路施工標書、國際投標書翻譯 basic telecommunications network" reason does not work, the crucial point is that there is no unified government monopoly, it is impossible endogenous mechanism for a competitive price招投標書翻譯價格. In order to break the monopoly, we should encourage the separation and competition, it will inevitably have to come a little duplication. This argument is, as long as the duplication of the "cost" less than the expected price招投標書翻譯價格 effect of competition, "income", for society is a cost-effective.Property and duplicationIn fact, there is no way to calculate the social and open competition after工程標書翻譯 項目建議書翻譯 設備標書翻譯 政府采購標書翻譯 軌道工程標書翻譯 鐵路建設標書翻譯 公路建設標書翻譯 橋梁隧道標書翻譯 裝飾工程標書翻譯 房屋建筑標書翻譯 石油標書翻譯 天然氣工程標書翻譯 化工工業(yè)標書翻譯 機電工程標書翻譯 建筑標書翻譯 the total of the "expected return." Above speak "to a little duplication", or the side to keep talking about the macro a "moderate duplication," strict scrutiny, meaning all ambiguities. In an open competition 外文標書翻譯system, the duplication of costs were made by various investors, but also future earnings are expected by these investors. Thus, at least in theory, increase the total expected future earnings may well not worth the sum of the cost of duplication. I believe this is what people talk at length about the "excessive competition." This excessive competition, or strictly speaking, the expected return is lower than competing duplication costs, is it not a waste of social resources, should be strictly controlled by the government do? Perhaps some will ask: Since you advocate allowing the telecommunications 標書制作行業(yè)industry, competition in the market, then how do you solve extremely expensive telecom infrastructure investments because of excessive competition and the enormous waste it?
|